Hi DRK,
great strategy and hard to beat. ;)
I feel that the Average Percent Profit Per Trade is too low to make it really tradable. What do you think?
Did you try to include some Transaction Weight ?
great strategy and hard to beat. ;)
I feel that the Average Percent Profit Per Trade is too low to make it really tradable. What do you think?
Did you try to include some Transaction Weight ?
Rename
Interesting to see where it winds up in the Rankings when we run them again tomorrow.
Against the Nasdaq 100 (dynamic), it seems like a winner!
QUOTE:
I feel that the Average Percent Profit Per Trade is too low to make it really tradable.
Well....
The parameters were chose to make the strategy look good in the rankings.
Use a higher percentage value for the MP indicator to get fewer trades with higher profits.
Interesting, this is becoming Deja Vu to the old wealth-lab site. Back then, we needed to create two separate rankings, one for Limit-based Strategies and one for those that just used Market orders. Will be time to consider this again soon!
In the description of the strategy, it mentions that the extension finantic.IndicatorSelection was used to select the CMF as the weight factor.
Is this a new, upcoming, extension?
Is this a new, upcoming, extension?
QUOTE:
Is this a new, upcoming, extension?
Yes.
I hope to get it finished before christmas though.
Thank you DrKoch!
I should be getting that one too…
I should be getting that one too…
Your Response
Post
Edit Post
Login is required