On your blog page here: https://wealth-lab.com/blog/wealthlab-data-providers there is in the description for EODHD the following:
I believe the above is not correct as it seems the EODHD extension is required.
QUOTE:
EODHD is included as a WealthLab core data provider; an extension installation is not required.
I believe the above is not correct as it seems the EODHD extension is required.
Rename
You're spot on, thanks. I just edited the blog page so a next website update will get it refreshed.
I had to look. You made the update, but the EODHD price is now stated in Euros. All other prices in that blog post are stated in U.S. dollars.
QUOTE:
EODHD
EOD+Intraday — All World Extended: €29.99/month
Now you're getting nit-picky!
Probably the EOD site currency changes based on your IP anyway. I don't know, but many similar sites do that. Let's just think of our blog as a "guide".
Probably the EOD site currency changes based on your IP anyway. I don't know, but many similar sites do that. Let's just think of our blog as a "guide".
But, I'm talking about the Wealth-Lab website blog, and this specific page: https://wealth-lab.com/blog/wealthlab-data-providers
For nit-picky... there are 30 dollar signs on the page, and one euro sign.
For nit-picky... there are 30 dollar signs on the page, and one euro sign.
Thanks Paul, I changed the euro symbol to a dollar there.
QUOTE:It would fine to know price in USD. For me it's in Euros -
For nit-picky... there are 30 dollar signs on the page, and one euro sign.
What are the Europeans to do with all the USD pricing?
Answer: It's just a guide. Find out what your price is by clicking the convenient links and going to the EODHD site.
Cone - I simply pointed out an inconsitency in YOUR webpage - that's it. One little thing, that looked like it was missed when the web page was updated. I was never talking about the EODHD website page - just your blog web page. I was simply trying to help you out.
I was only calling you out for nitpicky because you called yourself that yesterday for something that probably wasn't. This one was ;)
We appreciate your help though!
We appreciate your help though!
Your Response
Post
Edit Post
Login is required