Needs description and discussion.
Glitch has commented:
Because of the way streaming bar updates work and other factors this will likely be pretty difficult to do with a few weeks of dev time and the same testing. Just a heads up that it's no easy thing to just crank out, there are several considerations we'd need to discuss and figure out.
Glitch has commented:
Because of the way streaming bar updates work and other factors this will likely be pretty difficult to do with a few weeks of dev time and the same testing. Just a heads up that it's no easy thing to just crank out, there are several considerations we'd need to discuss and figure out.
Rename
Works fine except for fastSMA 8.
Yes but this is not a bug. The FastSMA's algorithm projects its calculation into the future. Normally you don't experience it but in this case the values become visible. If they were NaN then WL8 would simly drop them but since they aren't it's not possible to do here.
Consider this a peculiarity of the FastSMA. Workaround: use SMA.
Consider this a peculiarity of the FastSMA. Workaround: use SMA.
QUOTE:
... FastSMA's algorithm projects its calculation into the future.... If they were NaN then WL8 would simply drop them
So why not have FastSMA explicitly set the bogus end values to NaN at the finish?
Your Response
Post
Edit Post
Login is required