There is this "Push Indicator to C# Strategy Code" which is an ingenious action which modifies/enhances an existing script.
A future extension (or even Indicator Profiler) could find indicators which work best as entry filters, exit filters, risk management code and so forth.
Such extension would benefit from an API (Application Programming Interface) which allows code manipulations of existing coded strategies.
The extension would use the API to enhance an existing strategy by adding an entry filter for example.
This could accelerate strategy development tremendously.
Vote for it!
A future extension (or even Indicator Profiler) could find indicators which work best as entry filters, exit filters, risk management code and so forth.
Such extension would benefit from an API (Application Programming Interface) which allows code manipulations of existing coded strategies.
The extension would use the API to enhance an existing strategy by adding an entry filter for example.
This could accelerate strategy development tremendously.
Vote for it!
Rename
I'm not sure what kind of "API" we could provide. I'm not keen on trying to provide an API that manipulates C# strategy code like the "push indicators" does. It would be notoriously tricky and error prone. I guess if you had access to the strategy code you could perform whatever manipulations you like in your extension, and then re-assign the strategy code. That's as far as I think we'd be willing to go for such an "API."
QUOTE:
It would be notoriously tricky and error prone.
I agree.
I also think with the advent of Building Block API and Strategy Gene API there are much better ways to achieve theses goals.
So I'd suggest to close this #FeatureRequest.
QUOTE:
So I'd suggest to close this #FeatureRequest.
Done.
Your Response
Post
Edit Post
Login is required